Select an Assessment Tool

The next step is to determine how you want to assess the learning goals.

Consider questions such as:

  1. Which goal(s) do you want to measure? Use the assessment cycle table in the template to schedule which goals you will assess each cycle.
  2. How will you know if a student has achieved the goals? What will acieving the goal "look like"?

For example:

  • What does "devloping a sense of belonging and community" look like?
  • What are the essential elements that must be present in articulating "what culture is"?
  • What does a student need to be able to tell you, for you to know they can identify their next steps?

Consider your audience for the assessment data - what type of data is needed or do they respond to?

Direct vs Indirect

Choose a method that measures and captures how students demonstrate what they have learned vs their perception of what they have learned.

Direct measures of collecting information require student to display learning or "demonstrate their competence in one or more skills" (Banta and Palomba 2015, 79). For example, directly observing a student leader delegating to peers or a student navigating a process successfully. Other examples include collections of student work, pre-post tests, performance on a case study.

Indirect measures ask students or others to reflect on student learning. For example, asking a student leader to reflect on delegating to their peer. Other examples include questions asking self- perceptions of learning, job placement statistics, the percentage of students who graduate.

When writing questions or selecting a method, note that there is a difference in asking students if they learned vs. what they learned. The goal is to know what they learned.

An article by Pamelyn K. Shefman is a good one for understanding use of direct measures in cocurriculum.

*Banta, T. W., and C. A. Palomba. 2015. Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementing, and Improving Assessment
in Higher Education, 2nd ed. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Assessment Methods

Method General Description Strengths Weaknesses
Interviews A purposeful discussion with a single individual to get information.

Rich detail

Deeper levels of information

Gather information on topics we know little about

Does not require professional moderator

Does not require special facilities

Good for discussing sensitive topics

Flexible

Transcribing recorded conversation takes time and effort or if an outside company is hired to transcribe, money

A note-taker is recommended to ensure conversation is recorded

Time consuming if a large sample of students is needed

Breadth of understanding

Difficult to select and solicit participants

Not representative of population
Focus Groups An interview with a small group of people to get information on a specific topic or experience

Rich detail

Deeper levels of information

Gather information on topics we know little about/testing ideas

Does not require professional moderator

Does not require special facilities

Flexible

A large amount of data in a short amount of time

Transcribing recorded conversation takes time and effort or if an outside company is hired to transcribe, money

A note-taker is recommended to ensure conversation is recorded

Breadth of understanding

Difficult to select and solicit participants

Not representative of population
Observations Watching and recording a phenomenon within the context in which it occurs

Study natural behavior

Gather rich detail about behaviors
Based on the experience of the observer (bias, interpretation)
Documents Gathering documents such as minutes from meetings, reports, or files and analyzing them

Cost effective

Does not require soliciting participants
Does not directly measure behavior, opinions, attitudes, or values
Survey

Descriptive data about attitudes, behaviors, opinions, values of an individual are collected.

Note: The University provides Qualtrics which is a robust survey software available to anyone with a HawkID. Sign in via uiowa.qualtrics.com to get started

Flexible (multiple formats and question formats)

Ask a larger number of questions

Breadth of topics and understanding

Ability to develop internally or use standardized surveys

Questions can be written to get at direct measures of learning

Can result in a large amount of data

Based on self-report data which depends on accurate and honest responses

Often gathers data on indirect forms of student learning
Portfolio A collection of artifacts that demonstrate student learning

Opportunities for reflection

Opportunity for personal selection and assessment

Look at learning outcomes over time
Labor and time intensive to compile and review
Visual Methods Captures images (pictures, videos, artwork, sculptures, etc.) as main form of data

A picture says a thousand words.

Could use images for multiple uses

Technology

Smaller number of perspectives

Timeline

Technology
Rubric Detailed set of criteria for defining the standards for evaluation performance

Ability to develop a home grown rubric

Ability to use and tailor existing rubrics

Expose to students what we want them to learn

Reduces bias and/or subjectivity

Can take time to develop

Multiple raters may have to coordinate ratings for reliability

*Adapted from UoI Assessment Handbook, who adapted from Bresciani, Zelna, & Anderson (2004), Morgan (1998), Sanderson (2007), and Sanderson, Ketcham, Alexander (2008).

Bresciani, M. J., Zelna, C. L., & Anderson, J. A. (2004). Assessing student learning and development: A handbook for practitioners. Washington, D.C.: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
Morgan, D.L. (1998). The focus group guidebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Sanderson, R. (2007). Assessment 103 [PDF document]. Retrieved from  http://oregonstate.edu/studentaffairs/sites/default/files/docs/assessment103.pdf Sanderson, R., Ketcham, P. & Alexander, J. (2008). The “What,” “How,” and “So What?” of Assessment Measures [PDF document]. Retrieved from http:// oregonstate.edu/studentaffairs/sites/default/files/docs/TheWhatHowandSoWhatofAssessment2008.pdf